THESES ON COVENANT THEOLOGY
- Covenant theology structures all of Biblical revelation.
- The form of the covenants revealed in Scripture was borrowed
from and is accommodated to the ancient near eastern world and
must be understood in that context.
- Covenant is the most coherent explanation for Biblical revelation
and the nature and authority of the canon.
- Covenant theology did not arise de novo in the 16th
or 17th centuries but virtually all the elements which
made up Reformed covenant theology existed inchoately in earlier
- Reformed orthodoxy turned to covenant theology to give redemptive
historical expression to their exegetical (biblical) and dogmatic
- As understood and practiced by Reformed orthodoxy, there
was no meaningful distinction between covenant and federal theology.
- Orthodox Lutheranism appears to have rejected Reformed covenant
theology because they saw in it a confusion of Law and Gospel.
- Reformed theology turned to covenant theology however, not
to revise or reject Luther's breakthrough, but in order to preserve
the Protestant soteriology and relate coherently justification
- Classical Reformed theology taught three covenants: the covenant
of redemption (pactum salutis), the covenant of works
(foedus operum) and the covenant of grace (foedus gratiae).
- The God of the Bible relates to his creatures covenantally
from eternity (pactum salutis), in creation (covenant
of works), in providence (covenant of preservation) and in redemption
(covenant of grace).
- Hosea 6:7 ("like Adam") confirms the consciousness
of the Biblical authors of a prelapsarian covenant of works.
- The Apostle Paul presupposes the existence of a prelapsarian
covenant of works in passages such as Romans 2:13 and 4:4).
- The excommunication from the Tree of Life (Genesis 3:22-24)
confirms the probationary nature of the covenant of works.
- There were multiple signs and seals of the covenant of works
including the creational Sabbath, the tree of the knowledge of
good and evil and the tree of life.
- The first Gospel promise in Genesis 3:15 announces the covenant
of grace, i.e. redemption of the elect by the Mediator.
- The covenant of grace is the progressive historical account
of the administration of the Gospel in the history of redemption.
- The first Noahic covenant (Genesis 6:17-19) was particular
and an administration of the covenant of grace.
- The second Noahic covenant (Genesis 9:8-17) was a universal
non-soteric covenant promising the restraint of judgment until
the last day.
- The Abrahamic covenant is a renewal of the postlapsarian
covenant/promise made to Adam (Genesis 3:15; 17).
- In the history of redemption, the covenant of grace was renewed
in Abraham such that he is the father of all who believe (Romans
4:11; John 8:56).
- The Abrahamic covenant is logically as well as historically
prior to the Mosaic.
- The Mosaic covenant was not renewed under Christ, but the
Abrahamic covenant was.
- The land promise made to Abraham (Genesis 15:18; Exodus 6:4;
Judges 2:1) was typical of the coming blessings of the New Covenant
(Genesis 2:4; Galatians 3:14; Hebrews 8) and the final state
- All those justified under Moses were justified by grace alone,
through faith alone in Christ alone.
- With regard to the land promise, the Mosaic covenant was,
mutandis, for pedagogical reasons
(Galatians 3:23-4:7), a republication of the Adamic covenant of works.
- With regard to justification and salvation, the Mosaic covenant
was an administration of the covenant of grace.
- The Israelites were given the land and kept it by grace (2
Kings 13:23) but were expelled for failure to keep a temporary,
typical, pedagogical, covenant of works (Genesis 12:7; Exodus 6:4; Deuteronomy
29:19-29; 2 Kings 17:6-7; Ezekiel 17).
- The covenant of grace, initiated in history after the fall, was
in its antepenultimate state under Adam, Noah, and Abraham, its
penultimate state under the New Covenant administration and shall
reach its ultimate (eschatological) state in the consummation.
- The term "Old Covenant" as used in Scripture refers
to the Mosaic epoch not every epoch before the incarnation nor
to all of the Hebrew and Aramaic Scriptures indiscriminately.
- The New Covenant is new relative to Moses, not Abraham.
- The Old Covenant was temporary and typical of the New Covenant.
- In redemptive historical terms, the Old (Mosaic) Covenant
was weighted toward the ministry of the Law ("the letter")
whereas the New Covenant is weighted toward the ministry of the
Holy Spirit (2 Corinthians 3).
- The New Covenant is the fulfillment of the promise made to
Adam (Genesis 3:15) and the (Abrahamic) covenant of grace.
- The New Covenant is the reality typified by the pre-incarnational
types and shadows (2 Corinthians 1:20; John 6:32; Hebrews 7-9).
- Law (covenant of works) and gospel (covenant of grace) may
be distinguished historically and hermeneutically (i.e., the
- The hermeneutical distinction between law (covenant of
works) and gospel (covenant of grace) is the distinction between
our personal and perpetual obligation to keep the law perfectly
for justification and the announcement that Christ has kept the
law perfectly for us.
- The historical distinction between law
and gospel may be reckoned as the distinction between the
covenant of works and the covenant of grace.
- The historical
distinction between law and gospel may also be reckoned as the
distinction between Moses and Christ.
- When the law/gospel
distinction is reckoned as that between Moses and Christ, there
may be said to be gospel in the law and law in the gospel. This
way of speaking, however, may not be used properly when
considering the law/gospel distinction hermeneutically.
- Covenant theology is so of the essence of Reformed theology
that to revise its covenant theology is to revise the substance
of Reformed theology.
- The covenantal arrangement of the history of redemption and
the covenantal progressive revelation of Scripture is not a mere
convention, but rather a reflection of the intra-Trinitarian
- All the covenants revealed in Scripture contain both promised
blessing and threatened jeopardy.
5. The Covenant of Redemption (pactum
salutis; consilium pacis)
- The pre-temporal covenant of redemption (pactum salutis)
stands behind the covenant of works and covenant of grace and
orders the history of redemption.
- In the history of redemption, the pactum salutis means
works for the Son and grace for us.
- The pactum salutis is biblically grounded in Psalm
110, John 5:30; 6:38-40; 17; Gal 3:20 among other places.
- Christ fulfilled the legal obligations of the pactum salutis
in his active and passive obedience as the representative of
- The allegation that the pactum salutis tends to tritheism
seems to ignore the distinction between the economic and ontological
- The work of the Holy Spirit has not always been discussed
under the pactum salutis only because it focuses on the
accomplishment of redemption rather than the application
- Since the Spirit certainly consented to apply Christ's work
to the elect (John 15:26), there is no reason why the Holy Spirit's
work cannot be integrated into the pactum salutis.
6. The Covenant of Works (foedus
- The pre-lapsarian covenant may be called a covenant of works
in respect to its terms, a covenant of life in respect to its
goals and a covenant of nature in respect to its setting. All
three names describe the same covenant.
- In Reformed theology, the covenant of works is identical
to the Law which says: Do this and live.
- Jesus Christ fulfilled the covenant works in his active and
passive obedience to God's law on behalf of his people.
- The covenant of works was abrogated as a way to eternal life
by the fall.
- Post-lapsum the terms of the covenant of works continue
to obligate all rational creatures and must be perfectly fulfilled
personally or vicariously.
- Anyone who denies the prelapsarian covenant of works jeopardizes
the Biblical and Protestant doctrine of justification by grace
alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone.
7. The Covenant of Grace (foedus
- When we speak in covenantal terms we should always specify
to which covenant we refer.
- The pactum salutis is distinct from and the basis
of the covenant of grace.
- It is a grievous theological error to confuse the covenant
of works with the covenant of grace.
- The term covenant of grace can be used broadly and narrowly.
When used broadly, it refers to everyone who is baptized into
the Christ confessing covenant community. When used narrowly,
it refers to those who have received the double benefit of Christ:
justification and sanctification.
- Used in the broader sense, the covenant of grace is not synonymous
with election so that all the elect are in the covenant of grace,
but not all in the covenant of grace are elect.
- Used in the narrow sense, the covenant of grace refers only
to the elect.
- There is a just and necessary distinction to be made between
those who are in the covenant broadly (externally) and those
who are in the covenant both broadly and narrowly (internally).
- The internal/external distinction is a corollary of the distinction
between the church considered visibly and invisibly.
- Denial of the "internal/external" distinction leads
necessarily to confusing election and the decree or to positing
two types of election, decretal and "covenantal" (i.e., a
temporary, historical, conditional election) as is evident in
the so-called "Federal Vision" theology.
- The Gospel is not a promise of election but of a gracious
and sovereign salvation from sin which salvation is received
through faith alone.
- There are two chief benefits of the covenant of grace: justification
and sanctification of which justification has logical priority.
- The sole ground of justification is the fulfillment of the
condition of the covenant of works by Christ in his active and
- The sole object of justifying faith is Christ the Surety
of the covenant of redemption for us, and the fulfillment of
the covenant of works for us, and the Mediator of the covenant
of grace to us.
- The sole instrument of justification and condition of the
covenant of grace is a receptive, resting, extra-spective, faith
which trusts in Christs keeping of the covenant of works.
- Only believers receive the chief benefits of the covenant.
- In Reformed theology the covenant of grace is a Gospel covenant
having precisely the same terms and conditions as the Gospel.
- Justifying faith may be said to be the only proper condition
or instrument of the covenant of grace.
- The covenant of grace was inaugurated post-lapsum
and is to be distinguished sharply from the covenant of works.
- The covenant of grace is monopleural in origin and dipleural
in administration, i.e. the Gospel offer is unconditional in
origin but the reception of its benefits is conditioned upon
justifying faith which is itself only God's free gift to the
- Monocovenantalism or refusal to distinguish between the covenants
of works and grace implies a confusion of Law and Gospel.
- The slogan "in by grace, stay in by works,"
sometimes associated with the so-called "New Perspective on
nothing less than the Galatian heresy condemned by the Apostle
- Faith receives the benefits of the covenant of grace because
of God's grace and the virtue of its object (Christ) not because
of its qualities, virtues, or sanctity.
- It is unnecessary to juxtapose the legal and relational aspects
of covenant theology. In all three covenants, personal relations
are premised upon just legal relations.
- Sanctity is the second benefit of the covenant of grace and
flows from justification.
- Sanctity is as gracious as justification.
- Sanctity is logically and morally necessary as evidence of
regeneration, faith and justification.
- Considered relative to sanctification (in distinction from
justification) faith can be said to be active and is begun and
sustained by grace but involves human cooperation with sanctifying
- Sanctity is no instrument or ground of justification.
- Sanctity flows out of proper use of the divinely ordained
covenant signs and seals.
- The third use of the moral law is norm of covenant life.
- Denial of the third use of the Law (tertius usus legis)
leads to antinomianism.
- The third use of the law, like the first use, also drives
us to Christ.
- The church is both the universal and local Christ confessing
- God has ordained three special offices in the Christ confessing
covenant community: minister, elder and deacon.
- Christians are obligated to join themselves to a true Christ
confessing covenant community.
- The marks of a true, Christ confessing, covenant community
are the pure preaching of the Gospel (the covenant of grace),
the pure administration of the covenant signs and seals (sacraments)
and the administration of discipline.
- A genuinely Christian life cannot ordinarily be lived
outside a true Christ confessing covenant community.
- Members of the Christ confessing covenant community who have
received the sign and seal of the covenant are morally obligated
to live in fidelity to that community and to make regular and
consistent use of the means of grace (Word and sacrament).
- Attendance to the means of grace may be said to be stipulations
or moral obligations or even second order conditions of the covenant
of grace so long as they are distinguished from the proper condition
or instrument of the covenant of grace.
- The Word of the covenant is in two parts: Law and Gospel.
- The proclamation of the Gospel is the divinely ordained means
by which the Holy Spirit works faith in the hearts of members
of the covenant of grace.
- There are two signs and seals (sacraments) of the covenant
of grace, Baptism and the Lords Supper.
- The sacraments signify and seal the identity with and union
of the believer with the death and burial of Christ.
- As signs and seals of the covenant of grace, they are Gospel
- The sacraments are signs to all and seals to the elect.
- The covenant signs and seals are a blessing to the elect
but come also with jeopardy to the reprobate.
- Because of the visible/invisible distinction (internal/external)
it is possible to participate in the covenant signs and seals
to one's harm (1 Corinthians 10; Hebrews 6; 10).
- The covenant signs and seals are means of grace for all believers
whereby their faith is genuinely strengthened and their sanctification
- Because they deny the internal/external distinction, advocates
of "covenant objectivity" teach a view of the sacraments
which is virtually indistinguishable from the Roman ex opere
- In distinction from the Lord's Supper, Baptism is the sign
and seal of initiation into the covenant of grace.
- In the history of redemption, baptism succeeded circumcision
as the sign and seal of initiation.
- All baptized persons can be said to be in the covenant of
grace in the broad sense. Not everyone who is baptized receives
the substance or benefits of the covenant of grace.
- Baptism does not itself regenerate or necessarily unite the
baptized to Christ.
- Scripture requires the baptism of adult converts who have
not been previously baptized.
- Scripture teaches the baptism of covenant children.
- We do not baptize covenant children on the presumption of
their regeneration, but on basis of the divine command and promises
attached to baptism.
- Every objection made against covenant (infant) baptism which
can be made against covenant (infant) circumcision as practiced
under Abraham the father of New Covenant believers is for that
- Just as the old sign and seal of covenant initiation (circumcision)
could only be observed once so the new sign and seal of covenant
initiation (baptism) can only be observed once.
- In distinction from Baptism, the Supper is the sign and seal
of covenant renewal.
- As a sign of covenant renewal the Supper is not appropriate
for those who cannot understand the nature of Christ's presence
or the blessing and jeopardy which attach to the Supper.
- The Lord's Supper is the fulfillment of all the typical Israelite
- Just as believers fed on the Passover lamb, as the true Lamb
of God, Christ is really and truly present in the Supper.
- In the Supper, believers feed on Christ's true body and blood
by faith, through the operation of the Holy Spirit.
- Because the old covenant community feasted every time they
assembled and because the Supper is Christ's ordained sign and
seal of covenant renewal it ought to be observed every time the
new covenant community assembles.
- Like Dispensationalism, "New Covenant" theology
(NCT) is not sufficiently Trinitarian in its hermeneutic.
- NCT ignores the unity of the covenant of grace.
- It is unclear how NCT does not tend toward a radical discontinuity
between Moses and Christ.
- NCT does not account for the distinction between Moses and
- NCT tends toward antinomianism.
- Of the three stages in the history of Dispensationalism (classic,
modified, progressive), the first two are inimical to covenant
- Classic and modified Dispensationalism tend to a radical
(Marcionite) disjunction between Moses and Christ.
- Like Theonomy, Dispensationalism wrongly makes the Mosaic
covenant the goal rather than a temporary, typical arrangement.
- By positing two peoples, Dispensationalism resurrects the
dividing wall which Christ abolished in his flesh.
- Because the civil and ceremonial laws were specifically and
intentionally tied to the Old (Mosaic) covenant, they were fulfilled
in the Kingly and Priestly work of Christ and are therefore no
longer binding on the Christian.
- The Mosaic civil law, because it was specifically and intentionally
tied to the temporary and typical Old (Mosaic) covenant, it was
never intended to serve as norm for any other state than Mosaic-Davidic
- Any attempt to re-impose the Mosaic civil laws or their penalties
fails to understand the typological, temporary, national character
of the Old (Mosaic) covenant.
- The moral law, to the degree it expresses the substance of
God's moral will and is not tied to the ceremonies of the Old
covenant continues to bind all human beings.
- In the New Covenant, only the second table of the Law can
be said to bind the state.
- There are two kingdoms: that of the right hand and that of
- Both kingdoms are under the authority of Christ, but are
administered in diverse ways.
- In each kingdom, Christians live under Christ's lordship
according to the nature of that kingdom.
- The kingdom of the Right hand describes the ministry of Word
- The kingdom of the left hand describes the exercise of power
in the ecclesiastical and civil realms.
- Because of the distinction between the two kingdoms and because
the Decalogue is substantially identical with natural law, Christians
should advocate laws and policies in the civil realm on the basis
of the universal, natural knowledge of the second table of the
Email Dr Clark: clark at wscal dot edu
Wed 10:40 AM-12:40 PM
Prof. Clark's WSC Home Page
Prof. Clark's Personal Website
Office Hours Podcast
On the Writing of Essays
The statements, views and opinions...more